首页> 外文OA文献 >Valaciclovir versus aciclovir in patient initiated treatment of recurrent genital herpes: A randomised, double blind clinical trial
【2h】

Valaciclovir versus aciclovir in patient initiated treatment of recurrent genital herpes: A randomised, double blind clinical trial

机译:伐昔洛韦与阿昔洛韦治疗复发性生殖器疱疹的患者开始治疗:一项随机,双盲临床试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

textabstractObjective: To compare the efficacy and safety of twice daily valaciclovir with five times daily aciclovir in the treatment of an episode of recurrent genital herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection in immunocompetent individuals. Methods: 739 patients with a history of recurrent genital HSV infection received either oral valaciclovir (500 mg twice daily) or aciclovir (200 mg five times daily) for 5 days for treatment of their next recurrent episode in a controlled, randomised, double blind trial. Patients self initiated therapy at the first signs and/or symptoms of the HSV recurrence, then were assessed in clinic on five occasions over 7 days, and twice weekly thereafter until lesions had healed. Safety was evaluated through adverse experience reports and haematology and biochemistry monitoring. Results: No significant differences were detected between valaciclovir and aciclovir for the primary endpoint, the duration of all signs and symptoms which included lesion healing and pain/discomfort. The hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] for valaciclovir v aciclovir was 0 93 [0.79, 1.08]. Lesion healing time was similar in each treatment group (hazard ratio valaciclovir v aciclovir 0.96 [0.80, 1.14]). The odds ratio of valaciclovir v aciclovir in preventing the development of vesicular/ulcerative lesions was 1-08 [0.82, 1.42]. Percentages of patients in whom all HSV cultures were negative were similar in the valaciclovir and aciclovir groups at 59% and 54% respectively; for patients having equal to or more than one positive culture result after treatment initiation, cessation of virus shedding was similarly rapid for the two treatments (hazard ratio 0-98 [0.75, 1 .27]). The safety profiles of valaciclovir and aciclovir were comparable with adverse experiences being infrequent and generally mild. Conclusion: This study has demonstrated that valaciclovir 500 mg twice daily is equivalent in efficacy to aciclovir 200 mg five times daily as episodic treatment of recurrent genital HSV infection. Valaciclovir maintains the established efficacy and safety of aciclovir but offers a much more convenient twice daily dosing regimen.
机译:摘要:目的:比较每日两次使用缬氨西洛尔和每日五次阿昔洛韦治疗具有免疫功能的个体复发性生殖器单纯疱疹病毒(HSV)感染的疗效和安全性。方法:739名有生殖器HSV复发病史的患者接受了口服伐昔洛韦(每日两次500 mg)或阿昔洛韦(每日200 mg每天五次)治疗5天,以进行一项随机,对照,双盲对照试验。患者会在出现HSV复发的最初征兆和/或症状时自行开始治疗,然后在7天内分五次在临床中进行评估,此后每周两次,直至病变愈合。通过不良经验报告以及血液学和生物化学监测评估安全性。结果:伐昔洛韦和阿昔洛韦在主要终点,包括体征愈合和疼痛/不适在内的所有体征和症状持续时间方面均未发现明显差异。伐昔洛韦v阿昔洛韦的危险度为[95%置信区间]为0 93 [0.79,1.08]。每个治疗组的伤口愈合时间相似(风险比valaciclovir v aciclovir 0.96 [0.80,1.14])。 valaciclovir v aciclovir预防水疱/溃疡性病变发展的优势比为1-08 [0.82,1.42]。伐昔洛韦和阿昔洛韦组所有HSV培养阴性的患者百分比相似,分别为59%和54%。对于在治疗开始后具有等于或超过一种阳性培养结果的患者,两种治疗的病毒排出也相似地迅速停止(危险比0-98 [0.75,1 .27])。 valaciclovir和aciclovir的安全性相当,不良反应很少见,且一般较轻。结论:这项研究表明,作为反复发作的生殖器HSV感染的发作性治疗,每日两次500毫克的伐昔洛韦与每日两次5毫克的阿昔洛韦的疗效相当。伐昔洛韦维持已确立的阿昔洛韦疗效和安全性,但每天两次给药方案更为方便。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号